🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The final authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, mandating governments to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad protest both within the country and abroad.

22,000 people have signed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect similar debates in other member states